Monday, August 31, 2026 SourcesAbout🌓
🇺🇸 US ▾
BREAKING
Dominion still has pending lawsuits against election deniers such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell Russia is 'going backwards' in equipment and deploying post WWII-era tanks, according to Western officials Podcast: One country musician is calling for other artists to oppose assault rifles Bidets save you money and reduce waste — we tested the best options out there 50+ products to make your life easier and our planet cleaner Mother's Day is around the corner. Here are 50+ thoughtful gifts she'll love A head-to-toe guide of how men should dress this spring, and where they should shop 42 of the most useful travel products you can buy on Amazon The 7 best high-yield savings accounts of April 2023 Taxes are due tomorrow. Here's how to file for an extension Dominion still has pending lawsuits against election deniers such as Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell Russia is 'going backwards' in equipment and deploying post WWII-era tanks, according to Western officials Podcast: One country musician is calling for other artists to oppose assault rifles Bidets save you money and reduce waste — we tested the best options out there 50+ products to make your life easier and our planet cleaner Mother's Day is around the corner. Here are 50+ thoughtful gifts she'll love A head-to-toe guide of how men should dress this spring, and where they should shop 42 of the most useful travel products you can buy on Amazon The 7 best high-yield savings accounts of April 2023 Taxes are due tomorrow. Here's how to file for an extension
Latest

Donald Trump’s ‘Asinine’ Triumphal Arch Sparks Public Fury

The Daily Beast ·
Donald Trump’s ‘Asinine’ Triumphal Arch Sparks Public Fury

Photo Illustration by Thomas Levinson/The Daily Beast/Getty President Donald Trump’s proposed giant arch has drawn more than 100,000 public comments describing the vanity project as “garish,” “grotesque,” “tacky,” and “authoritarian”.

A new National Park Service assessment has laid bare the scale of the project—and the torrent of opposition it faces as the 80-year-old president tries to remake Washington in his own image.

Some of the sharpest objections concerned the impact on nearby Arlington National Cemetery, the sacred burial ground for fallen soldiers from across American history.

One woman warned the 250-foot arch would “desecrate the solemnity of the Arlington Cemetery as a hallowed place of repose for those military members and their families.” Another person criticized the fact that triumphal arches signify victory and conquest, whereas the Lincoln-Arlington corridor represents “service and sacrifice.” And one commentator simply urged: “Please shut down this asinine assault on America.

We don’t need or want an arch, a ballroom, or any of the other tributes he has put forward to stroke his ego.

No! No! No!” But the more damaging assessment arguably came from the government itself.

In a new report, the National Park Service concluded that the project would have “adverse effects” on several historic landmarks because of changes to space, land use, vegetation, and views.

The damage would be particularly concentrated around Memorial Circle, where the arch will be built near the cemetery on one side and the Lincoln Memorial on the other.

But the project would also affect the National Mall, the U.S.

Capitol, the Washington Monument, the Jefferson Memorial, the Georgetown Historic District, the Old Naval Observatory, the Key Bridge, and the National Cathedral, the report says.

The 133-page assessment also makes clear that the Arch is more like a building, with five levels, an exterior spanning 9,812 square feet, and an observation deck situated 160 feet above the ground.

Visitors would reach the top via elevators and spiral staircases after passing through airport-style security screening.

But the structure is so high that people standing on it could be visible from Arlington National Cemetery, which conducts about 30 funeral services each day.

What’s more, the project would require foundations drilled about 71 feet into the ground, where the NPS admits there is a “moderate to high sensitivity” for intact archaeological resources.

Read the full article on The Daily Beast ›

5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.thedailybeast.com — the content belongs to The Daily Beast.

More from The Daily Beast

See all ›

More in Latest

See all ›