NFL lifts abuse suspensions on Green Bay's Josh Jacobs and Denver's Jonathon Cooper as investigations continue
Friday was a sort of "get out of jail" day at the NFL, as Green Bay Packers running back Josh Jacobs and Denver Broncos linebacker Jonathon Cooper learned they are coming off suspensions on the Commissioner's Exempt List.
Both players have missed the start of their teams' seasons — with Cooper missing six games and Jacobs about to miss his sixth game on Sunday — because both were on the Commissioner's list in connection to domestic abuse allegations and litigation.
But Cooper is coming off the list immediately and will be eligible to play in Denver's Week 7 game at the Arizona Cardinals because the Broncos already played their Week 6 game.
JOSH JACOBS SUES POLICE TO PERMANENTLY SEAL VIDEO EVIDENCE IN BATTERY CASE AGAINST HIM Jacobs will come off the list on Monday after the Packers play their Sunday night game against the Dallas Cowboys.
Jacobs will be eligible to play in the Packers' Week 7 game at the Detroit Lions.
So, we good? Well, not completely.
Both players, arrested in the offseason on charges tied to domestic abuse involving their girlfriends, remain the subjects of ongoing league investigations .
So, if or when new information comes to light about either player relating to their incidents this offseason, they are subject to further discipline.
That stipulation is more likely to affect Cooper than Jacobs.
Why? Because Jacobs struck a plea deal on Sept.
10 that ostensibly resolved the criminal case he was facing.
He pleaded no contest to two misdemeanor charges of battery and criminal damage to property in the case involving his ex.
BRONCOS STAR SPEAKS OUT FOLLOWING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ARREST, FIRES OFF AN APOLOGY Jacobs was ordered to pay a $1,000 fine, attend counseling, pay restitution for property he destroyed and have no further contact with the victim.
If the running back meets those conditions for one year, the property damage charge will be dismissed.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on www.foxnews.com — the content belongs to Fox News.