Are the ACOTAR leaks real? Here’s what we know, without spoilers.
The next ACOTAR book isn’t out yet, but some readers are already muting fan pages.
Images purportedly showing pages from Sarah J.
Maas's upcoming A Court of Splintered Harmony are circulating online, leaving fans with the choice between scrutinizing the alleged spoilers and trying to make it to the Oct.
27 release without seeing them.
For some, that second option is proving difficult.
In the Facebook group A Court of Thorns and Roses 18+ , one reader reported repeatedly encountering alleged leaks on TikTok.
"I keep trying to avoid them like a plague, but it's literally EVERYWHERE," they wrote.
Another had already taken precautions: "I muted all of my ACOTAR fan pages for a month." With almost two weeks until the sixth installment in Maas's romantasy series arrives, apparently even visiting a fan group has become a potential spoiler risk.
Here’s what we know, without getting into the purported plot revelations.
SEE ALSO: Sarah J.
Maas announces two new 'A Court of Thorns and Roses' books What are the alleged ACOTAR leaks? Much of the discussion centers on photos purportedly showing pages 242 through 247 that were shared in the r/acotar subreddit . (The linked thread contains potential spoilers.) Readers have been picking apart everything from the characters' apparent behavior to the objects visible around the book, looking for clues about whether the images are genuine.
One commenter, identifying themselves as an Amazon fulfillment center employee, claimed to recognize the setting.
"I work at an Amazon FC, I can confirm the books came in last week, and these are our yellow totes and the gloves we wear," they wrote.
Other readers questioned the images' appearance and whether the prose sounded like Maas, leaving the discussion caught between analyzing a possible scene and wondering whether there was any reason to analyze it at all.
5News aggregated this summary from the outlet’s public feed. The full article, with all the context, is on mashable.com — the content belongs to Mashable.