Remaking the biscuit: from Doritos to digestives, why the UK’s snacks are being ‘reformulated’

Healthy eating rules are forcing brands to recook their recipes. Are consumers noticing the difference?

B ite into a Ritz cracker today and you’re eating 80% less saturated fat than you would have been just a few years ago. The biscuit looks and snaps the same, and tastes close enough that most buyers have no idea they’re eating a new recipe.

One of the biggest changes was swapping palm oil for sunflower oil, but there was much more to it than that. The reformulation took years to perfect in a laboratory, where scientists tested everything from density to how the cracker responds to heat, moisture and packaging.

It’s a story playing out across an entire industry. From Doritos to digestives, Britain’s best-loved snacks have been re-engineered, gram by gram, to meet stricter government rules on foods high in fat, sugar and salt. BelVita’s soft bakes range, including its bestselling choc chip and choc hazelnut flavours, has been reformulated to fall outside the “less healthy” category, with sodium cut by 56%.

Since January 2026, paid-for advertising of high-fat, salt and sugar (HFSS) products was banned online entirely. Now the industry faces a fresh problem: the government is reviewing the formula that decides which foods count as “less healthy” in the first place. Food companies warn the changes could undo years of work overnight – the Food and Drink Federation estimates 80% of reformulated products could fail under the new model, particularly on sugar.

Earlier this month at the Reading Scientific Services Ltd (RSSL) – the lab where, for many of Britain’s snack foods, recipes go to get rebuilt – that tension is being discussed. Mondelēz International, the global food and beverage giant behind Oreo and Ritz, has invested £40m since 2020 in reformulation work.

The UK is now the company’s largest research and development hub anywhere in the world, with more than 750 scientists and engineers working across nutrition and product innovation at Bournville consumer research centre and RSSL.

The government is proposing a tougher Nutrient Profiling Model (NPM), including stricter thresholds for free sugars and greater weighting for fibre. The changes could mean some products that manufacturers have already changed to reduce sugar are classified as “less healthy”, potentially bringing them within advertising and promotion restrictions.

Jacinta George, managing director at RSSL, says the current nutrient profiling model, drawn up in 2018, counts “free sugars” against a product’s score but there’s no settled definition of what that term actually means.

“The inclusion of free sugars in the 2018 NPM model is incredibly challenging for manufacturers, as there is no universally agreed definition of what a free sugar is,” George says. “There is also no standardised laboratory method for distinguishing between intrinsic and free sugars.”

Swapping out sugar isn’t as simple as removing it, either. “Sugar does more than sweeten – it provides texture, bulk and preservation,” George says. “Sweeteners provide sweetness but not these other qualities, meaning additional bulking agents or functional ingredients may be needed.