Netanyahu’s October 7 response has no endgame. Russia has a stake in what follows

From Gaza to Iran, military dominance has failed to produce a sustainable political order, leaving the region more volatile On October 7, 2023, Israel faced a horrific attack when Hamas killed over a thousand of its citizens and took hundreds of hostages.

This atrocity can never be justified.

But there is another fact that we cannot ignore: Israel’s overconfidence and conviction of superiority over its adversaries led to the country’s most catastrophic security failure.

Three years later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government still has no convincing answer as to how the ensuing war is supposed to secure a safer future for the country.

More firepower, no endgame The Israeli leadership’s main takeaway from the October 7 tragedy was the need to strike earlier, harder, and deeper.

Deterrence gave way to destruction and elimination – first of the adversaries’ military capabilities, then of their leaders.

The war expanded beyond Gaza, engulfed Lebanon, and finally escalated to a direct confrontation with Iran.

Aggression became the guiding principle of regional policy.

Yet, the tragedy also demanded a reassessment of the adversary, a sober evaluation of the country’s intelligence, and governmental accountability.

Force can punish an enemy, but it cannot rectify the errors that made the attack possible in the first place.

Here, we clearly see the main contradiction of Netanyahu’s policy.

Israel can destroy command centers, eliminate commanders, demolish infrastructure, and occupy territory.

However, it is incomparably more difficult to shape neighboring societies in a way that would prevent the threat from re-emerging.

The government expanded its military objectives but never defined a realistic political outcome.