Opposition to amend Park Act grows as writers urge repeal, Karandlaje writes to Governor

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

Opposition to an Amendment to the Karnataka Government Parks (Preservation) Act, 1975, is mounting as a forum of Kannada writers and progressive thinkers, on Tuesday, urged the State government to withdraw its Amendment.

Meanwhile, Shobha Karandlaje, Minister of State for Labour and Employment and Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, wrote to Governor Thaawar Chand Gehlot, requesting that he not accord assent to the Act, calling it a “regressive” and “draconian legislation”.

“The parent enactment was conceived to preserve government parks and gardens; the present Amendment, on the contrary, creates a sweeping statutory mechanism for their alienation and utilisation for purposes other than their preservation,” she said.

The Karnataka Government Parks (Preservation) (Amendment) Bill, 2026, allows the alienation of 5% of parks and garden lands for public purposes.

In a statement, Jagrutha Nagarikaru Karnataka argued that the 5% provision was not merely a number but a question concerning the city’s future green spaces. It expressed concern that the exemption could be misused in the future and lead to further diversion of park land.

“Parks are not merely spaces for people to walk. They provide essential environmental services such as clean air, shade, rainwater absorption, biodiversity, and temperature regulation,” the organisation said.

The group also questioned the government’s stated intention of allowing the land for “public purposes”, claiming that there was a lack of transparency in the proposal.

Referring to Cubbon Park, the forum said several government and private offices and clubs already occupied space within the park and expressed apprehension that Lalbagh and other major parks could face a similar fate.

The group also highlighted Bengaluru’s air pollution and said the city needed more parks and green spaces, rather than a policy that could reduce the area of existing parks.

“Such unilateral decisions, without adequate foresight, are unscientific and inhumane,” the organisation said, urging the government to act responsibly with the city’s long-term interests in mind.

The forum demanded that before any portion of a park is diverted for another purpose, the government must publicly disclose the environmental impact, the availability of alternative locations, and the actual necessity of the change. It also called for consultation with residents and the independent assessment of projects that could affect the environment.

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.